Zcash Dev Fund Poll (July 2024)
public election created by Jack Gavigan
The purpose of this poll is to determine whether there is clear consensus amongst the Zcash community that a new Dev Fund should be established when the current Dev Fund expires in November, and, if so, which Dev Fund proposal should be adopted.
Respondents should read this blog post, which contains important information about this poll.
A summary of the various Dev Fund proposals can be found here.
Here is a list of the Dev Fund proposals, with links to the relevant ZIPs, which we strongly encourage you to review in detail.
The outcome of the poll to decide between the various Dev Fund proposals will be determined using a Majority Choice Approval (MCA-M or Modified Bucklin) voting method, which works as follows: Respondents rate each proposal on the 5-point scale. First, only the "Strongly Approve" ratings are counted. If one or more proposals is rated “Strongly Approve” by more than 50% of respondents, the proposal with the highest number is selected for implementation in NU6. If not, the number of "Approve" ratings is added to the "Strongly Approve" counts. If a proposal now is approved of by more than 50% of respondents, it is regarded as the preferred proposal. If there is still no clear consensus, "Neutral" ratings are added, and so on. The proposal with the highest combined total in each step is regarded as the preferred proposal if it reaches more than 50%.
In the event that two or more proposals garner majority support, but there is no clear community consensus, there will be a runoff poll.
Questions 8 and 9 solicit respondents’ input regarding the future evolution of the Dev Fund, specifically regarding direct versus non-direct funding models. For more context and information, please read the accompanying blog post.
Voting end at July 15, 2024, 9 a.m.
questions (9)
|
voters & ballots
|
trustees (1)
This election is complete.
Tally
Question #1
The Dev Fund should end and 100% of the block reward should go to miners.
Strongly Approve | 23 |
Approve | 10 |
Neutral | 15 |
Disapprove | 27 |
Strongly Disapprove | 62 |
Question #2
Manufacturing Consent: This Dev Fund would last for four years and consist of 15% of the block rewards in the following allocation: 5% for the Zcash Foundation (ZF), 4% for Bootstrap Project (parent of ECC) for the first year only, 4% for Zcash Community Grants (ZCG), 2% for QEDIT. Following the first year, when Bootstrap/ECC will no longer receive their 4% allocation, those block subsidies will be distributed as 1% to ZCG, 1% to ZecHub, 1% to ZF, and 1% to the Financial Privacy Foundation. More info: https://zips.z.cash/draft-noamchom67-manufacturing-consent
Strongly Approve | 20 |
Approve | 24 |
Neutral | 20 |
Disapprove | 25 |
Strongly Disapprove | 47 |
Question #3
Lockbox For Decentralized Grants Allocation (50% Perpetual Option): This Dev Fund would allocate 50% of the block rewards to a lockbox in perpetuity designated for future decentralized grants funding. More info: https://zips.z.cash/draft-nuttycom-funding-allocation#alternative-1-lockbox-for-decentralized-grants-allocation-perpetual-50-option
Strongly Approve | 11 |
Approve | 24 |
Neutral | 22 |
Disapprove | 30 |
Strongly Disapprove | 50 |
Question #4
Establishing a Hybrid Dev Fund for ZF, ZCG and a Dev Fund Reserve: This Dev Fund would last for two years and consist of 20% of the block rewards in the following allocation: 6.4% for ZF, 8% for ZCG, and 5.6% for a Dev Fund Reserve that is stored in a lockbox pending a future decision on how to disburse those funds. More info: https://zips.z.cash/draft-zf-community-dev-fund-2-proposal
Strongly Approve | 22 |
Approve | 31 |
Neutral | 21 |
Disapprove | 22 |
Strongly Disapprove | 39 |
Question #5
Hybrid Deferred Dev Fund: Transitioning to a Non-Direct Funding Model: This Dev Fund would last for one year and consist of 20% of the block rewards in the following allocation: 12% to a lockbox designated for future decentralized grants funding and 8% to Zcash Community Grants. More info: https://zips.z.cash/draft-nuttycom-funding-allocation#alternative-2-hybrid-deferred-dev-fund-transitioning-to-a-non-direct-funding-model
Strongly Approve | 19 |
Approve | 36 |
Neutral | 28 |
Disapprove | 23 |
Strongly Disapprove | 31 |
Question #6
Lockbox For Decentralized Grants Allocation (20% Option): This Dev Fund would last for two years and allocate 20% of the block rewards to a lockbox designated for future decentralized grants funding. More info: https://zips.z.cash/draft-nuttycom-funding-allocation#alternative-3-lockbox-for-decentralized-grants-allocation-20-option
Strongly Approve | 19 |
Approve | 34 |
Neutral | 33 |
Disapprove | 25 |
Strongly Disapprove | 26 |
Question #7
Masters of the Universe?: This Dev Fund would last for four years and allocate 25% of the block rewards as follows: 17% to a lockbox designated for future decentralized grants funding, and 8% to Zcash Community Grants. More info: https://zips.z.cash/draft-nuttycom-funding-allocation#alternative-4-masters-of-the-universe
Strongly Approve | 15 |
Approve | 23 |
Neutral | 26 |
Disapprove | 33 |
Strongly Disapprove | 40 |
Question #8
In a Non-Direct Funding Model, funds would be locked in a multi-signature wallet and distributed as grants. Individual entities' wallet addresses would removed from the protocol, and a percentage of block rewards would go into the multi-sig wallet. Those seeking funding to contribute to Zcash would be required to submit proposals and compete for funding. Please indicate your support for transitioning Zcash development funding to a Non-Direct Funding Model in the future.
Strongly Approve | 32 |
Approve | 23 |
Neutral | 13 |
Disapprove | 5 |
Strongly Disapprove | 23 |
I wish to reserve judgment until more information about a Non-Direct Funding Model is available | 41 |
Question #9
The Direct Funding Model (used by the current Dev Fund) allocates block rewards directly to specific entities or organizations, embedding their wallet addresses into the protocol for a specified period of time. Please indicate your support for a Dev Fund that uses a Direct Funding Model.
Strongly Approve | 15 |
Approve | 28 |
Neutral | 22 |
Disapprove | 13 |
Strongly Disapprove | 38 |
I wish to reserve judgment until more information about a Non-Direct Funding Model is available | 20 |